Who or what is Setebos? What is going on with the pronouns, and why does the speaker, Caliban from Shakespeare’s late play “The Tempest”. Twenty years after Browning had written Caliban upon Setebos he once singled it out as his most representative ” dramatic ” poem.’ For Browning the word. Significant quotes in Robert Browning’s Caliban Upon Setebos with explanations .
|Published (Last):||9 October 2006|
|PDF File Size:||15.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.66 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The striking epigraph or motto is from Psalm And then, at the end of an hour or so of this monologue, with, apparently, only himself as his audience, Caliban realises that Setebos has found him out: Who or what is Setebos?
What neither Setebos nor Caliban can stand is boastful confidence in any creature. Is Browning satirising evolutionary theory, biblical criticism, Calvinist doctrine — or even the critics of these troubling currents of thought? But perhaps Caliban is the rightful heir to the island? But now, having temporarily evaded their supervision, his speech has the tone of a resentful and mischievous Seteboos teenage boy.
Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves. His dam held different, that after death He both plagued enemies and feasted friends: Book titles OR Journal titles. What’s more, he quickly gets tipsy on calliban vegetable juice, and experiences the sensation of maggots in the brain.
This is a poem about, and exemplifying, art as well as creation, writing as well as making. She said that Setebos did not make, seyebos merely toyed with, the creatures of the island.
Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential setebox and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
It was fool’s play, this prattling! What is going on with the pronouns, and why does the speaker, Caliban from Shakespeare’s late play “The Tempest”, switch between the third and first person in talking about himself? Without cookies your experience may not be seamless.
Again disagreeing with his mother, Caliban doesn’t expect any afterlife, damnation or salvation: It’s a fiction created out of an earlier, Shakespearean fiction, and a mimicking and impersonation of an unreal yet vivid creature who can never be known with certainty, coming as he does from an earlier and inexhaustible text.
The wind Shoulders the pillared dust, death’s house o’ sdtebos move, And fast invading fires begin! And who is Caliban’s Master? White blaze — A tree’s seteboa snaps- and there, there, there, there, there, His thunder follows! And feels about his spine small eft-things course, Run in and out each arm, and make him laugh:. These were made by the Quiet, a mysterious and indifferent higher god who is the antithesis of the capricious, vindictive and noisily thunderous Setebos.
He also fears him. In a way, Setebos is also, in Caliban’s mind, an extension of the temporarily absent Prospero. Why are there square brackets around the opening and closing passages? Setebos, Setebos and Setebos!
I find the poem ironical rather than satirical. Last night I was talking with a friend who read aloud a passage from Dr. Thus Setebos is, in a sense, a creature of Caliban’s drink-heated imagination, even though he thinks Setebos has uopn him. Caliban has seteboa told by setsbos witch mother Sycorax who is now dead, about a god, Setebos, who lives in the moon: Newman’s Apology in which he says that “he is as convinced of the existence of God”—an individual, not an external force merely—”as of his own existence: And feels about his spine small eft-things course, Run in and out each arm, and make him laugh: How, remaining beggars—or poor, at least—we may at once look for the love of those to whom we give our mite, though we throw it into the darkness where they only may be: Caliban both worships and dreads Setebos, setebls hopes that eventually he will be conquered by the Quiet, or fall into a long decrepit doze.
Walter Bell Scott’s painting of Shakespeare’s Caliban.
Department of English
According to Clyde de L. He initially uses the third person, perhaps in case he is overheard, and perhaps because he seems at times to view himself from the outside. I can see nothing that comes from absolute contactso to speak, between man and God, but everything in caljban variety from the greater or less distance between the two. Yet something important is going on: This will bring down their wrath.
Edinburgh University Press, Browning here seems aware of how arguments such as Newman’s can be appropriated, taken out of context, and used on incursions into the scientific sphere to justify the enterprise of natural theology, even if Newman’s argument for the existence of God is not being used for that purpose in the passage under discussion.
Browning is keenly aware of the not very subtle anthropomorphism that underwrites the postulation of setegos personate deity whose attributes kpon an individual are both knowable and known, not to mention the solipsism of such a postulation. Caliban initially talks of himself in the third person while sprawling on his stomach, his chin propped on his balled fists, and his feet splashing in murky water, with little newts tickling his back and arms and mimicking the circulation of his blood: The vital flame which proceeded from him at first returns to him in our perfected form at last, bearing with it all good and lovely things, and making of all the far-extending Past but one intense Present, glorious and everlasting.
There is a tradition running from Walter Bagehot to the present which regards both the poem and Caliban as types of the grotesque, but, while there is something in this, I would also stress Browning’s empathy for his speaker — an empathy which Caliban seldom shows to the other creatures of the island — and even his pride in both the poem and Caliban. The monologue is soon over, so there isn’t time for Caliban to undertake some great or groping spiritual pilgrimage.
What happens in Browning’s “Caliban upon Setebos”?
Again, this is not the language of Christian theology. Further Reading Holmes, John. The real Caliban spends most of his time doing pointless work for Calibn and Miranda. Unfortunately for him, Caliban forgets setbos this disposition also applies to the speculation he is indulging in, with consequences we will come to. By the end of the poem, though, the thought is far more complex because the relationship between creator and setebox has been subjected to a shuttling process, leaving in doubt even the priority between the two.